Lehmann v. Murphy
384 S.W.3d 345, 2012 WL 4355501, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1198
Opinion
ORDER
Paul Lehmann appeals the trial court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Gunilla Murphy, D.D.S., on his action for dental malpractice. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lehmann v. Murphy, 384 S.W.3d 345, 2012 WL 4355501, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1198 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
384 S.W.3d 345 (Lehmann v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.