Lehmann v. Lehmann

258 A.D. 950, 17 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8363

Opinion

The objections interposed by the defendant to the following proposed cross-interrogatories to be propounded to the defendant should have been sustained: 13, 26 to 38, inclusive, 56 and 64; as to the witness Arthur Walter: 12 to 18, inclusive, 23 to 26, inclusive, 30, 31, 38, 41 and 45 to 48, inclusive; as to the witness Berta Margarete Streller-Botta: 23 to 29, inclusive, 34 to 37, inclusive, 41, 42, [951]*95149 and 56 to 59, inclusive; as to the witness Fritz Zenker, 6, 7, 10 13, 14, 21 and 28 to 32, inclusive; as to the witness Dr. Otto Buerger: 7, 8, 14, 15, 22, 25, 30 to 33, inclusive, and 39 to 44, inclusive. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified accordingly, and, as so modified, afSrmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lehmann v. Lehmann, 258 A.D. 950, 17 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

258 A.D. 950 (Lehmann v. Lehmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.