Lehman v. Piontkowski

74 A.D.2d 841, 425 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10603
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to enjoin defendant from violating a covenant not to compete, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 3, 1979, which denied their motion for a preliminary injunction. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We agree with Special Term that the record reveals serious doubts as to whether the defendant’s expulsion as a director of the corporation, the involuntary transfer of his stock and the termination of his employment with the corporation, were proper and lawful (see Business Corporation Law, §§ 702, 708). Consequently, it is entirely possible that plaintiffs are [842] suffering no legal injury whatsoever, since all the income derived by the defendant subsequent to the July 23, 1979 "expulsion meeting” may actually be corporate income. In any event, we agree with Special Term that plaintiffs have a more than adequate remedy at law if successful at trial, through an award of monetary damages. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lehman v. Piontkowski, 74 A.D.2d 841, 425 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

74 A.D.2d 841 (Lehman v. Piontkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Modern Telecommunications, Inc. v. Zimmerman
140 A.D.2d 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Lehman v. Piontkowski
93 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)