Lehman v. Piontkowski
460 N.E.2d 1091, 61 N.Y.2d 703, 472 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4010
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 809). We would only note that the expulsion of defendant as a director may not have been improper.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lehman v. Piontkowski, 460 N.E.2d 1091, 61 N.Y.2d 703, 472 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4010 (N.Y. 1984).
460 N.E.2d 1091 (Lehman v. Piontkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yemini v. Goldberg
119 A.D.3d 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Collins v. Telcoa International Corp.
283 A.D.2d 128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Mitel Telecommunications Systems, Inc. v. Napolitano
226 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Rodgers v. Bell
202 A.D.2d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Lehman v. Piontkowski
135 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)