Lehman v. A/S/M Communications, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lehman v. A/S/M Communications, Inc.

128 A.D.2d 433, 512 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 433 (Lehman v. A/S/M Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lehman v. A/S/M Communications, Inc., 128 A.D.2d 433, 512 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about May 8, 1986, and order of said court (Robert White, J.), entered on October 8, 1986, unanimously affirmed. Defendant-appellant-respondent shall recover of plaintiff-respondent-appellant one bill of $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal and cross appeal. Motion by defendant-appellant-respondent for leave to supplement the record on appeal to include certain material granted, and motion by plaintiff-respondent-appellant to strike defendant-appellant-respondent’s supplemental brief denied. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about May 8, 1986, and order of said court (Robert White, J.), entered on October 8, 1986, unanimously affirmed. Defendant-appellant-respondent shall recover of plaintiff-respondent-appellant one bill of $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal and cross appeal. Motion by defendant-appellant-respondent for leave to supplement the record on appeal to include certain material granted, and motion by plaintiff-respondent-appellant to strike defendant-appellant-respondent’s supplemental brief denied. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 433, 512 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehman-v-asm-communications-inc-nyappdiv-1987.