Lehman Bros. v. Cox

New York Court of Appeals

Lehman Bros. v. Cox

883 N.E.2d 355, 10 N.Y.3d 743

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 14, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 883 N.E.2d 355 (Lehman Bros. v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lehman Bros. v. Cox, 883 N.E.2d 355, 10 N.Y.3d 743 (N.Y. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, petition denied in its entirety and respondent’s cross motion, insofar as it sought to confirm the arbitrator’s award to him of $48,000, granted. Petitioner Lehman Brothers failed to meet its heavy burden to vacate the arbitration award on respondent Cox’s counterclaim.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, petition denied in its entirety and respondent’s cross motion, insofar as it sought to confirm the arbitrator’s award to him of $48,000, granted. Petitioner Lehman Brothers failed to meet its heavy burden to vacate the arbitration award on respondent Cox’s counterclaim.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

883 N.E.2d 355, 10 N.Y.3d 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehman-bros-v-cox-ny-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack