Lehman Bros. v. Bradley
62 Ala. 31
Opinion
The bill is filed to subject lands descended to the payment of a debt of the intestate. The only evidence of the indebtedness was the transcript of a judgment against the personal representative. There is no privity between the personal representative and the heir, and a judgment against the former is no evidence against the latter in proceedings to subject lands descended. — Darrington v. Borland, 3 Port. 9; Teague v. Corbitt, 57 Ala. 529.
The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lehman Bros. v. Bradley, 62 Ala. 31 (Ala. 1878).
62 Ala. 31 (Lehman Bros. v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLaughlin v. Rote
62 Colo. 505 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1917)
Howell v. Hughes
53 So. 105 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)
Wright v. Voorhees
108 N.W. 758 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)