Lehman Bros. v. Bradley
This text of 62 Ala. 31 (Lehman Bros. v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill is filed to subject lands descended to the payment of a debt of the intestate. The only evidence of the indebtedness was the transcript of a judgment against the personal representative. There is no privity between the personal representative and the heir, and a judgment against the former is no evidence against the latter in proceedings to subject lands descended. — Darrington v. Borland, 3 Port. 9; Teague v. Corbitt, 57 Ala. 529.
The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Ala. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehman-bros-v-bradley-ala-1878.