Lehmair v. Griswold

8 Jones & S. 100
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 6, 1875
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Jones & S. 100 (Lehmair v. Griswold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lehmair v. Griswold, 8 Jones & S. 100 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1875).

Opinion

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

The summons is for relief, and the complaint is in tort, alleging a conversion of two sums of money. For the purposes of this appeal, the character of the action is determined by the complaint.

The counter-claims demurred to, are, therefore, not available in this action under § 150 of the Code.

They do not arise out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of the plaintiff’s claim, nor are they connected with the subject of the action. The words “the subject of the action” mean “the facts constituting plaintiff’s cause of action” (Chamberet v. Cagney, 2 Sweeny, 385).

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Speir, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chamboret v. Cagney
2 Sweeny 378 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Jones & S. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehmair-v-griswold-nysuperctnyc-1875.