Lehigh & Wilkesbarre Coal Co. v. Lear

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Lehigh & Wilkesbarre Coal Co. v. Lear

9 A. 267, 6 Sadler 272, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 455

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 25, 1887

DocketNo. 177, E. D.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 A. 267 (Lehigh & Wilkesbarre Coal Co. v. Lear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lehigh & Wilkesbarre Coal Co. v. Lear, 9 A. 267, 6 Sadler 272, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 455 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case was submitted to the jury in a correct charge. Hnder the evidence it would have been error to take it from them. There was evidence that the plaintiff below did stop to look and listen, before he crossed the track. Whether under all the evidence he stopped a.t a proper place was a question of fact for the jury. The great interval which elapsed between the time of the alleged injury and the bringing of the suit was properly called to the attention of the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This case was submitted to the jury in a correct charge. Hnder the evidence it would have been error to take it from them. There was evidence that the plaintiff below did stop to look and listen, before he crossed the track. Whether under all the evidence he stopped a.t a proper place was a question of fact for the jury. The great interval which elapsed between the time of the alleged injury and the bringing of the suit was properly called to the attention of the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A. 267, 6 Sadler 272, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehigh-wilkesbarre-coal-co-v-lear-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack