Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co. v. Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co.

227 F. 1019, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2399
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 5, 1915·No. Nos. 295, 296·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A libel and cross-libel were filed in the District Court. These together constitute but one cause. The District Judge directed that the cross-libel be dismissed and that the original libelant recover some $4,000 against the cross-libelant. Instead of entering one decree, as the proper practice is, separate decrees were entered, and the cross-libelant appealed from, each. The two claims were tried together in the District Court as one cause. But one record was printed on appeal and but one argument had in this court. The appellant having succeeded very substantially in this court, viz., having reversed the decree against it, waa given a full bill of costs, and we still think it was entitled thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co. v. Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co., 227 F. 1019, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2399 (2d Cir. 1915).

227 F. 1019 (Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co. v. Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

France & Canada S. S. Co. v. French Republic
285 F. 290 (Second Circuit, 1922)