Lehigh Portland Cement Company v. The Federal Trade Commission
This text of 416 F.2d 971 (Lehigh Portland Cement Company v. The Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
416 F.2d 971
LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, Appellant
v.
The FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al., Appellees.
No. 13228.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued October 6, 1969.
Decided October 27, 1969.
Appeal from Order and Judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria; Oren R. Lewis, Judge.
Frederick M. Rowe, Washington, D. C. (Edward W. Hyland, Armistead L. Boothe, Boothe, Dudley, Koontz, Blankingship & Stump, Alexandria, Va., and Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellant.
Harold D. Rhynedance, Jr., Atty., Federal Trade Commission (William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Brian P. Gettings, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.
Before BRYAN, CRAVEN, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the opinion of the district court, 291 F.Supp. 628. We think the district judge carefully considered, contrary to appellant's contention, the totality of the circumstances, and correctly determined that the suit was premature.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 F.2d 971, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10286, 1969 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehigh-portland-cement-company-v-the-federal-trade-commission-ca4-1969.