Leghorn v. Ross

369 N.E.2d 763, 42 N.Y.2d 1043, 399 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2380
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 1977·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Although parol evidence is admissible to defeat a motion for summary judgment, no such evidence, or other evidence, aside from conclusory statements, was submitted.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leghorn v. Ross, 369 N.E.2d 763, 42 N.Y.2d 1043, 399 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2380 (N.Y. 1977).

369 N.E.2d 763 (Leghorn v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Rentals (North America), Inc. v. Iron Age Tool Corp.
2017 NY Slip Op 4314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
DEFORGE, JOHN v. KARWOSKI, LYNDI
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
DeForge v. Karwoski
87 A.D.3d 1323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Pro-Specialties, Inc. v. Thomas Funding Corp.
812 F.2d 797 (Second Circuit, 1987)
Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Kenney Plumbing, Inc.
125 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Vanier v. Vanier
119 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Barr v. Raffe
97 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Torelli v. Esposito
93 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re the Estate of Revson
86 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Smith v. Slocum
71 A.D.2d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)