Leggio v. Broussard

163 So. 2d 356, 246 La. 75, 1964 La. LEXIS 2474
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 4, 1964
DocketNo. 47206
StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 2d 356 (Leggio v. Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leggio v. Broussard, 163 So. 2d 356, 246 La. 75, 1964 La. LEXIS 2474 (La. 1964).

Opinion

In re: A. B. Broussard, Jr., A. B. Brous-sard and Sons, Inc., and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 162 So.2d 23.

Writ refused. According to the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no merit in the assignment of error.

McCALEB, J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted as this case is one exclusively cognizable under the Employers Liability Act. See Dobson v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 228 La. 837, 84 So.2d 210 — As a tort action, no recovery should be had as plaintiff assumed the risk of injury as operator of the tractor under the circumstances presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dobson v. Standard Accident Insurance Company
84 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1955)
Leggio v. Broussard
162 So. 2d 23 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 2d 356, 246 La. 75, 1964 La. LEXIS 2474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leggio-v-broussard-la-1964.