Leggett Vs. Washoe Cty.
This text of Leggett Vs. Washoe Cty. (Leggett Vs. Washoe Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
COREY LEGGETT, No. 80479 Appellant, vs. WASHOE COUNTY, Respondent.
1 r,
MAR 0 5
BY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order granting motion for judgment on the pleadings. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to have been prematurely filed under NRAP 4(a) because there is a pending motion to reconsider in the district court. This court may dismiss as premature a notice of appeal filed before entry of the written disposition of the last remaining timely motion listed in NRAP 4(a)(4). See AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (explaining when a motion for reconsideration has tolling effect
zo-0891--° under NRAP 4(a)(4)(C)); NRAP 4(a)(6). We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and accordingly we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Aisa6.0 Stiglich
Silver
cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Corey Leggett Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .111rio 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leggett Vs. Washoe Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leggett-vs-washoe-cty-nev-2020.