Leggett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leggett v. State

548 So. 2d 249, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1348, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3097, 1989 WL 57873

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1989·No. No. 88-662·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

JOANOS, Judge.

Leggett has appealed his conviction for aggravated child abuse. He alleges that the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion, pursuant to Section 92.53(1), Florida Statutes, to allow videotaping of the testimony of the child victim, on the ground that such procedure violated his right under the federal and state constitutions to face-to-face confrontation of witnesses against him. Under the facts presented herein, we affirm on the authority of Glendening v. State, 536 So.2d 212 (Fla.1988). See also Sampson v. State, 541 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

ERVIN, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN, (Ret'd), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOANOS, Judge.

Leggett has appealed his conviction for aggravated child abuse. He alleges that the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion, pursuant to Section 92.53(1), Florida Statutes, to allow videotaping of the testimony of the child victim, on the ground that such procedure violated his right under the federal and state constitutions to face-to-face confrontation of witnesses against him. Under the facts presented herein, we affirm on the authority of Glendening v. State, 536 So.2d 212 (Fla.1988). See also Sampson v. State, 541 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

ERVIN, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN, (Ret'd), Associate Judge, concur.

Leggett v. State, 548 So. 2d 249, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1348, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3097, 1989 WL 57873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

548 So. 2d 249 (Leggett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related