Leggett v. State
This text of 548 So. 2d 249 (Leggett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Leggett has appealed his conviction for aggravated child abuse. He alleges that the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion, pursuant to Section 92.53(1), Florida Statutes, to allow videotaping of the testimony of the child victim, on the ground that such procedure violated his right under the federal and state constitutions to face-to-face confrontation of witnesses against him. Under the facts presented herein, we affirm on the authority of Glendening v. State, 536 So.2d 212 (Fla.1988). See also Sampson v. State, 541 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 So. 2d 249, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1348, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3097, 1989 WL 57873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leggett-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.