Leggett v. Dubois
1 Paige Ch. 574, 1829 N.Y. LEXIS 379, 1829 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 83
Opinion
[575]*575The Chancellor :—The right to deposits of this description cannot be ascertained in this stage of the suit. Although the injunction is dissolved on the coming in of the answer, it may be revived and made perpetual on the final hearing, upon the pleadings and proofs. If it should turn out by the final decree in this cause that the suit at law was unconscientious or inequitable, the defendants would not be entitled to the costs which they had improperly made in that suit. The deposit must remain to abide the final decision of the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leggett v. Dubois, 1 Paige Ch. 574, 1829 N.Y. LEXIS 379, 1829 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 83 (N.Y. 1829).
1 Paige Ch. 574 (Leggett v. Dubois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lockwood's Dollar Cleaners, Inc. v. Lockwood
137 Misc. 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Perrine v. White
36 N.J. Eq. 1 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1882)
Jones v. McKenna
72 Tenn. 630 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1880)
Saleski v. Boyd
32 Ark. 74 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1877)
Musgrove v. Lusk
2 Tenn. Ch. R. 576 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1875)