Leggett v. Boorum

2 Edw. Ch. 630, 1836 N.Y. LEXIS 260, 1836 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1
New York Court of Chancery·Decided November 21, 1836·Published

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor:

This case appears to fall within the rule laid down in Smets v. Williams, 4 Paige’s C. R. 367, and exonerates the complainants from paying the defendant’s costs on dismission of the bill. Some specific property, namely, household furniture, is pointed out which the [631] complainants had some reason to believe might be applicable to their judgment, but which was afterwards swept off by a landlord’s warrant, it was sold for more than one hundred dollars. The complainants are willing to have their bill dismissed ; and, under the circumstances, they are entitled to have it dismissed, each party paying their own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leggett v. Boorum, 2 Edw. Ch. 630, 1836 N.Y. LEXIS 260, 1836 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1 (N.Y. 1836).

2 Edw. Ch. 630 (Leggett v. Boorum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.