Legg v. United States

40 Ct. Cl. 115, 1904 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 4, 1904 WL 858
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedDecember 20, 1904
DocketNo. 24656
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 Ct. Cl. 115 (Legg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Legg v. United States, 40 Ct. Cl. 115, 1904 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 4, 1904 WL 858 (cc 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The status of a soldier at the time when the furlough period began governs in such cases. If the soldier was then sick and incapacitated for duty, whether with the regiment or in a hospital or at his home, he can not be considered as [117]*117having received a furlough. If he became sick after the furlough period began and after he had received a furlough, the sickness was his misfortune, and he can not be considered as then on duty.

The judgment of the court in this case is that the claimant recover $125.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. United States
43 Ct. Cl. 1 (Court of Claims, 1907)
Mitchell v. United States
41 Ct. Cl. 36 (Court of Claims, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ct. Cl. 115, 1904 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 4, 1904 WL 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/legg-v-united-states-cc-1904.