Legg v. Rhodes
This text of 599 F. App'x 67 (Legg v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald L. Legg appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [68]*68error. Accordingly, we deny Legg’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court’s orders. Legg v. Rhodes, No. 4:12-cv-00811-RMG, 2012 WL 2106298, 2013 WL 4042035 (D.S.C. June 11, 2012, Aug. 6, 2013 & Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 F. App'x 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/legg-v-rhodes-ca4-2015.