Legerlotz v. Rogers

Supreme Court

Legerlotz v. Rogers

361 U.S. 808, 80 S. Ct. 76, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 386

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 12, 1959

DocketNo. 213

StatusPublished

This text of 361 U.S. 808 (Legerlotz v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Legerlotz v. Rogers, 361 U.S. 808, 80 S. Ct. 76, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 386 (1959).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the District-of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted. Counsel are directed to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, among other questions, the question whether the amendment of a “Return Order,” as opposed to a “Notice of Intention to Return,” is permissible, under the pertinent regulations or otherwise, and, if not, the effect of such an amendment on' the pertinent limitations period.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals for the District-of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted. Counsel are directed to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, among other questions, the question whether the amendment of a “Return Order,” as opposed to a “Notice of Intention to Return,” is permissible, under the pertinent regulations or otherwise, and, if not, the effect of such an amendment on' the pertinent limitations period.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

361 U.S. 808, 80 S. Ct. 76, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/legerlotz-v-rogers-scotus-1959.