Leger v. Kent

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Leger v. Kent

810 So. 2d 1163, 2002 La. LEXIS 741, 2002 WL 459840

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 8, 2002

DocketNo. 2001-CC-3353

StatusPublished

This text of 810 So. 2d 1163 (Leger v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leger v. Kent, 810 So. 2d 1163, 2002 La. LEXIS 741, 2002 WL 459840 (La. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Kent, John N. D.D.S. et al.; Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College d/b/a; L.S.U. School of Dentistry; Louisiana State University; — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, Nos. 92-20925, 98-18330; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2001-C-2241.

Granted. Under the facts presented, it appears defendants’ application was filed within thirty days from the trial court’s [1164]*1164November 2, 2001 ruling. In any event, it was clearly filed within the time limit authorized by the trial court. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kent, John N. D.D.S. et al.; Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College d/b/a; L.S.U. School of Dentistry; Louisiana State University; — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, Nos. 92-20925, 98-18330; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2001-C-2241.

Granted. Under the facts presented, it appears defendants’ application was filed within thirty days from the trial court’s [1164]*1164November 2, 2001 ruling. In any event, it was clearly filed within the time limit authorized by the trial court. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

810 So. 2d 1163, 2002 La. LEXIS 741, 2002 WL 459840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leger-v-kent-la-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack