Legends Gym, Inc. v. ABCO Leasing, Inc.
This text of 122 F. App'x 167 (Legends Gym, Inc. v. ABCO Leasing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this dispute over a contract for the lease of gym equipment, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant Legends Gym appeals the district court’s ruling granting summary *168 judgment for ABCO Leasing (“ABCO”) and awarding ABCO’s counsel attorney’s fees in the amount of $21,290.44, after ABCO requested $82,093.31. We review the district court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment de novo, Reliance Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Tomlinson, 171 F.3d 1033, 1035 (5th Cir.1999), and the grant of attorney’s fees for abuse of discretion. Communication Workers of America v. Ector County Hosp. Dist., 392 F.3d 733 (5th Cir.2004). After a review of the record, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment for ABCO and separate order granting ABCO’s attorney’s fees for essentially the reasons as well stated in the district court’s memorandum opinions and orders.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *168 the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 F. App'x 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/legends-gym-inc-v-abco-leasing-inc-ca5-2005.