LEGENDRE v. State

361 S.W.3d 475, 2012 WL 827740, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 316
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 13, 2012
DocketED 96520
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 361 S.W.3d 475 (LEGENDRE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LEGENDRE v. State, 361 S.W.3d 475, 2012 WL 827740, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Robert Legendre, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rowell
361 S.W.3d 475 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 S.W.3d 475, 2012 WL 827740, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/legendre-v-state-moctapp-2012.