Legallee v. Blaisdell

134 Mass. 473, 1883 Mass. LEXIS 332
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 12, 1883·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Morton, C. J.

This is an action of tort for a malicious arrest. To maintain the action, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that, at the time the defendant procured the arrest, he had no probable cause to believe that the plaintiff intended to leave the State. It is not enough to prove that he did not in fact intend to leave the State. All the evidence in this case is consistent with the theory that the defendant honestly believed, and had good reason to believe, that the plaintiff did intend to leave the State. The plaintiff therefore did not sustain the burden of proof, and prove his case; and the Superior Court rightly directed a verdict for the defendant.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legallee v. Blaisdell, 134 Mass. 473, 1883 Mass. LEXIS 332 (Mass. 1883).

134 Mass. 473 (Legallee v. Blaisdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Selfridge
34 App. D.C. 242 (D.C. Circuit, 1910)
Black v. Buckingham
54 N.E. 494 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Jackson v. Knowlton
53 N.E. 134 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Lauzon v. Charroux
28 A. 975 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1894)
Everett v. Henderson
14 N.E. 932 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)