August 12, 1977
78-81 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT
Executive Order No. 11222— Standards of Conduct— Government Officials Writing Articles and Books
You have asked our advice regarding the legality and propriety of Presiden tial appointees’ writing articles and books for publication, either with or without compensation, including writing that is related to the official’s area of responsibility as well as writing that is not.
For the most part, these types of activities are governed by Executive Order No. 11222 o f May 8, 1965 (30 F. R. 6469) and Civil Service Commission and agency regulations implementing the Executive order, rather than by the conflict o f interest laws with which the Office of Legal Counsel is concerned. Because each appointee is subject to the standard of conduct regulations of his agency, it would be advisable for the appointee to consult those regulations and to contact the agency’s ethics counselor1 if a question arises concerning the propriety o f writing or lecturing in a given instance. In fact, several agencies require their employees to obtain approval before engaging in outside activities concerning their official work. See, e .g ., 22 CFR 10.735-204(c) (State); 29 CFR 0.735-13 (Labor); 31 CFR 0.735-38 (Treasury); 45 CFR 73.735-403 (O(HEW). However, we can offer the following general observations on the issues involved.
I. Compensated Activities Section 202 o f Executive Order No. 11222 establishes the outlines of Executive branch policy on outside activities, including writing:
An employee shall not engage in any outside employment,
'U nder Civil Service Com m ission regulations, each agency head designates a top-ranking em ployee o f the agency to serve as ethics counselor whose responsibility is to give “ authoritative advice and guidance” on questions o f conflicts o f interest and related matters covered by Part 735 o f the C om m ission’s regulations. 5 CFR 735.105. The Ethics Counsel o f the Civil Service Com m ission in turn advises agency ethics counselors on questions o f interpretation arising under Executive O rder No. 11222 and im plem enting Civil Service Com m ission regulations; and the Office o f Legal Counsel advises agencies on questions arising under conflict o f interest laws.
362
including teaching, lecturing, or writing, which might result in a conflict, or an apparent conflict, between the private interests of the employee and his official government duties and responsibilities, although such teaching, lecturing, and writing by employees are generally to be encouraged so long as the laws, the provisions of this order, and Civil Service Commission and agency regulations cover ing conflict of interest and outside employment are observed.
Under applicable laws and regulations, a question would ordinarily be raised whenever a Presidential appointee is to receive compensation for the publica tion o f an article or book that deals with his official duties.
In the most extreme situation, where an article (or speech later reduced to article form) was prepared or delivered as part o f the individual’s official duties, receipt of nongovernmental compensation for the delivery or publica tion would violate 18 U .S.C . § 209(a), which (with exceptions not pertinent here) prohibits the receipt o f any contribution to or supplementation of salary from outside sources as compensation for an individual’s services to the Government.
In addition, Civil Service Commission regulations expressly prohibit the receipt o f compensation by som e Presidential appointees for certain activities that are not actually part o f the person’s official duties:
[A]n employee who is a Presidential appointee covered by section 401(a) o f [Executive O rder 11222] shall not receive compensation or anything o f monetary value for any consultation, lecture, discussion, writing, or appearance the subject m atter o f which is devoted substantially to the responsibilities, programs, or operations of his agency, or which draws substantially on official data or ideas which have not become part o f the body o f public information. 5 CFR 735.203(c).
As the regulation makes clear, it applies only to Presidential appointees covered by section 401(a) o f the Executive order, which covers only: (1) agency heads; (2) full-time members of com m ittees, boards, and commissions appointed by the President; and (3) Presidential appointees in the Executive Office of the President who are not subordinate to the head o f an agency in that office. Thus, in an Executive departm ent, the Civil Service Commission regulation would apply only to the head o f the departm ent. However, several departments, in their own regulations, have extended this prohibition to cover all agency em ployees.2
2See, e.g., 15 CFR 0.735-12(c)(2) (Com m erce); 28 CFR 4 5.735-12(b) (Justice). See also 7 CFR 0.735-13(a)(4) (A griculture). The regulations o f other Executive departm ents parallel the Civil Service Com m ission regulation by applying this lim itation only to Presidential appointees covered by section 401(a) of the E xecutive order. See 32 CFR 40.12(e), as am ended, 42 F .R . 3649 (D efense); 45 CFR 73.735-401(e) (H EW ); 24 CFR 0.735.204(e)(1) (HU D ); 43 CFR 20.735-33(d) (Interior); 29 CFR 0.735 11(a) (Labor); 22 CFR 10.735-204(c) (State); 49 CFR 9 9 .7 3 5 -1 1(d) as am ended, 42 Fed. Reg. 3120 (Transportation); 31 CFR 0.735-39(b) (Treasury).
363
Where an article or book does not contain a significant amount of nonpublic governmental information, the scope of the prohibition in the Civil Service Commission regulation and identical agency regulations in particular situations depends on the meaning of the phrase “ devoted substantially to the responsibil ities, programs, or operations of his agency.” The phrase can be given a narrow interpretation barring the receipt of compensation only where the article or book relates to existing statutory responsibilities and programs o f the agency. Alternatively, the phrase “ responsibilities . . . o f his agency” can be read to encompass the general subject matter or sector of the economy or society with which the individual’s agency is concerned, even though the writing does not specifically relate to the functions of the agency. A search of our conflict of interest files reveals that we have given the quoted phrase in the comparable Department of Justice regulation the broader of the two readings mentioned above as it applies to top-level Department officials.
In the only memorandum we have been able to locate involving a Presiden tial appointee, this office advised a former Attorney General that he could accept compensation for the publication o f a collection of his essays so long as the subject matter was not substantially related to areas of Department of Justice activity. We took the position that the purpose of the regulation was to preclude an employee o f the Department from profiting from publication where it was likely to be attractive to the public because it represented views o f a Department official on subject matter within the responsibilities of the Department. Thus, the form er Attorney General was advised that he could receive compensation for publication of general jurisprudential essays concern ing legal education or ethics, but not those relating to antitrust or civil rights laws. The same interpretation o f the regulation underlay this office’s conclu sion in 1972 that a member of the Board o f Parole could not accept compensation for speeches related to the general subjects o f correction trends and reform s.3 This broader reading of the Civil Service Commission regulation finds additional support in the more general prohibition in section 201(c)(1) of Executive Order No. 11222 against engaging in any activity “ which might result in, or create the appearance of . . . using public office for private g ain .” This restriction also appears in Civil Service Commission and agency regula tions implementing the Executive order. See, e .g ., 5 CFR 735.201a(a). In fact, where a high-level official receives compensation for speaking or writing related to his official responsibilities, a significant question of “ appearances” may be raised under the general prohibition just quoted, even if the official is not covered by a regulation expressly barring the receipt o f compensation for
3On the other hand, we have advised low er-level em ployees o f the Department that they may receive com pensation for teaching and writing in the area o f law for which they have responsibility. We believe this more liberal policy for lower-level personnel is warranted because their ser vices are not usually sought in order to ascertain the position o f the Departm ent on key policy issues; they are not authorized to state that position, and their activities are therefore not likely to be attractive to the anticipated audience because o f their affiliation with the Departm ent.
364
speaking or writing “ devoted substantially to the responsibilities, programs, or operations of his agency.”
As a convenient rule o f thum b for determ ining when an outside activity such as writing is sufficiently related to official duties so as to suggest that the receipt o f compensation may be improper, reference may be made to a Department of Commerce regulation prohibiting the receipt o f compensation for an activity where there is reason to believe that the invitation to do so was extended partly because of the official position of the employee concerned. 15 CFR 0.735-12(b)(3). We em phasize, however, that the application of pertinent regulations in a specific instance is initially a m atter for the ethics counselor of the agency involved, with the advice o f the Civil Service Commission, which has responsibility for implementing Executive Order No. 11222.
The legality and propriety o f a Presidential appointee receiving compensation for a book or article is governed by somewhat different considerations when the subject matter has no relation to the individual’s official duties and responsibili ties. It is possible that in a given case the author might be relying on his visibility in office to generate interest in a book or article about his prior experiences or other matters— or seem to be doing so— and thereby create the appearance o f using public office for private gain. This would depend, of course, on the particular facts in the specific case.
W here acceptance is proper, the amount o f compensation received is limited by the honorarium statute, 2 U .S .C . § 441i, to $2,000 per article or appearance, and a total of $25,000 in a calendar year.4 It should be noted, however, that this $2,000 ceiling does not include reim bursem ent for expenses in connection with the writing or appearance, and the overall ceiling has not been construed to apply to the writing o f books, as opposed to newspaper or magazine articles. See Election Law Guidebook, Sen. Doc. No. 216, 94th C ong., 2d sess. 6 (1976). Also, in preparing a book or article, the official would be required to abide by pertinent regulations and other restrictions limiting the use of Government property, personnel, appropriated funds, and nonpublic informa tion for officially approved purposes, and not for private purposes. See, e .g ., Executive Order No. 11222, §§ 202, 204, and 205; 5 CFR 735.203, 205, and 206.
4It m ight be suggested that the $2,000 ceiling im posed by 2 U .S .C . § 441i on the amount of honoraria a G overnm ent official m ay receive indicates that honoraria o f less than $2,000 are not unlawful under any circum stances as long as the overall ceiling o f $25,000 is not exceeded. We are not aware o f any suggestion in the legislative history that Congress intended to preempt all other restrictions on the receipt o f com pensation, and we would be most reluctant to construe it to do so in view o f Congress’ heightened concern in other contexts regarding the receipt o f gifts and outside incom e by officials o f the executive and legislative branches. The provision instead appears to impose an additional restriction on the am ount o f honoraria an official may receive, perhaps because the am ount o f an honorarium often has little relation to the personal effort o f the Governm ent official and therefore represents easy m eans by which a top-level Governm ent official may supplem ent his income.
365
II. Uncompensated Activities Outside activities for which an individual will not be compensated create less of a conflict of interest problem. O f course, the individual would have to abide by restrictions just mentioned prohibiting the use of agency property, personnel, and appropriated funds for personal or other nongovernmental purposes. Regulations also prohibit a Government official, “ for the purpose of furthering a private interest,” from using or allowing the use o f official information obtained through or in connection with his Government em ploy ment which has not been made available to the general public. 5 CFR 735.206. Thus, while a Presidential appointee could appropriately release theretofore nonpublic information in an official speech or paper, it would appear that he could not do so in a private publication where the primary purpose was to benefit a private interest rather than to release agency views in an acceptable forum.
Finally, we have interpreted the Justice Department regulation prohibiting activities that create the appearance o f using public office for private gain to apply even where the private gain will be realized by a person or organization other than the Government official. This suggests that Department of Justice employees, including Presidential appointees, should avoid lending their official position to support the financial causes o f private organizations— through speeches, the writing of articles, or in some other fashion. It may be that comparable regulations o f other agencies would be construed in the same fashion.
Our observations on this subject have necessarily been general. These activities are generally governed by Executive Order No. 11222 and implementing Civil Service Commission and agency regulations, as to which we are not in a position to give an authoritative construction. In a given case, it would be advisable for the Presidential appointee to review the regulations o f the particular agency involved and to consult the ethics counselor o f this agency, especially where prior approval may be required.
L eo n U lm a n
D eputy A ssistant A ttorney G eneral Office o f L egal Counsel