Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections
This text of 101 So. 3d 404 (Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with our decision in McBride v. Moore, 780 So.2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), the circuit court correctly concluded that after being sentenced as an habitual offender, petitioner was ineligible for provisional credits on all his sentences, including those imposed before he was designated an habitual offender. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of certiora-ri on the merits, but CERTIFY that our [405]*405decision conflicts with Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 So. 3d 404, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leftwich-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2012.