Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections

101 So. 3d 404, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2691
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 26, 2012
DocketNo. 1D12-1739
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 So. 3d 404 (Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections, 101 So. 3d 404, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2691 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with our decision in McBride v. Moore, 780 So.2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), the circuit court correctly concluded that after being sentenced as an habitual offender, petitioner was ineligible for provisional credits on all his sentences, including those imposed before he was designated an habitual offender. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of certiora-ri on the merits, but CERTIFY that our [405]*405decision conflicts with Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

WOLF, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert B. Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections
148 So. 3d 79 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 3d 404, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leftwich-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2012.