Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections
101 So. 3d 404, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2691
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 2012·No. No. 1D12-1739·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
In accordance with our decision in McBride v. Moore, 780 So.2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), the circuit court correctly concluded that after being sentenced as an habitual offender, petitioner was ineligible for provisional credits on all his sentences, including those imposed before he was designated an habitual offender. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of certiora-ri on the merits, but CERTIFY that our [405] decision conflicts with Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections, 101 So. 3d 404, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20235, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2691 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
101 So. 3d 404 (Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robert B. Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections
148 So. 3d 79 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)