Lefstein & Rosenfeld Co. v. Hunt
This text of 168 A.D. 929 (Lefstein & Rosenfeld Co. v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. The determination was within the discretion of the justice. He might well be reluctant to convict of contempt on ex parte papers, and he might well remit the creditor to the remedy of procuring the attendance of the debtor by attachment. (See Matter of Nejez, 54 Misc. Rep. 38.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefstein-rosenfeld-co-v-hunt-nyappdiv-1915.