Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc.

260 So. 3d 515
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 2018
DocketNo. 3D17-1767
StatusPublished

This text of 260 So. 3d 515 (Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbonell v. BellSouth Telcomms., Inc., 675 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ("A party seeking a continuance bears the burden of showing, by affidavit, the existence and availability of other evidence, its relevance, the efforts taken to produce it, and that any failure to do so is not the result of the movant's inexcusable delay." (citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(f) ) ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carbonell v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUN.
675 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 So. 3d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leflora-v-royal-am-mgmt-inc-fladistctapp-2018.