Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc.

260 So. 3d 515
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2018·No. No. 3D17-1767·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbonell v. BellSouth Telcomms., Inc., 675 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ("A party seeking a continuance bears the burden of showing, by affidavit, the existence and availability of other evidence, its relevance, the efforts taken to produce it, and that any failure to do so is not the result of the movant's inexcusable delay." (citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(f) ) ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

260 So. 3d 515 (Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carbonell v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUN.
675 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)