Lefleur v. Liberty Laundry Co.

35 N.E.2d 482, 306 Mass. 618, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 1100
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 27, 1940·Published

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff was hurt when the wheel of a truck in which he was riding fell into a pit around a cellar window. The grating over the pit was loose. The truck was operated by a fellow servant in the employ of the uninsured defendant. The auditor found the operator negligent. That finding warranted the verdict for the plaintiff. That finding did not purport to be a mere conclusion from subsidiary facts found. But subsidiary [619] facts and other evidence outside the report tended to support the general finding of negligence.

E. S. Searle & S. Keedy, for the defendant, submitted a brief. No argument nor brief for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lefleur v. Liberty Laundry Co., 35 N.E.2d 482, 306 Mass. 618, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 1100 (Mass. 1940).

35 N.E.2d 482 (Lefleur v. Liberty Laundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.