Lefkowitz v. Julius Grossman, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lefkowitz v. Julius Grossman, Inc.

249 A.D. 845, 294 N.Y.S. 343, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9972

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 845 (Lefkowitz v. Julius Grossman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lefkowitz v. Julius Grossman, Inc., 249 A.D. 845, 294 N.Y.S. 343, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner moved for a peremptory mandamus order directing the respondent corporations to produce books and records for examination and inspection, or for an alternative order directed to the same purpose. The motion was denied. A reargument was granted, and on reargument the Special Term made an order in which it “ adhered to ” the original decision. The petitioner appeals from the original order in so far as it denied the application for an alternative mandamus order, and from the order entered on reargument. Order dated November 2, 1936, in so far as an appeal is taken, unanimously affirmed, with costs, in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Appeal from order dated October 16, 1936, dismissed. Present—■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner moved for a peremptory mandamus order directing the respondent corporations to produce books and records for examination and inspection, or for an alternative order directed to the same purpose. The motion was denied. A reargument was granted, and on reargument the Special Term made an order in which it “ adhered to ” the original decision. The petitioner appeals from the original order in so far as it denied the application for an alternative mandamus order, and from the order entered on reargument. Order dated November 2, 1936, in so far as an appeal is taken, unanimously affirmed, with costs, in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Appeal from order dated October 16, 1936, dismissed. Present—■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 845, 294 N.Y.S. 343, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefkowitz-v-julius-grossman-inc-nyappdiv-1937.