Lefkowitz v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lefkowitz v. Friedman

54 A.D.2d 689, 387 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 689 (Lefkowitz v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lefkowitz v. Friedman, 54 A.D.2d 689, 387 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 13, 1975, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment, and (2) a further order of the same court, dated July 29, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated May 13, 1975 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated July 29, 1975 affirmed insofar as appealed from. Defendant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. The plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 13, 1975, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment, and (2) a further order of the same court, dated July 29, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated May 13, 1975 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated July 29, 1975 affirmed insofar as appealed from. Defendant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. The plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 689, 387 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefkowitz-v-friedman-nyappdiv-1976.