Lefkowitz v. Etra & Etra

13 A.D.3d 132, 787 N.Y.S.2d 5, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15039
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered April 22, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion pursuant to CELR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[133] The instant claim for contribution is based upon allegations of breach of duty that were previously raised by plaintiff, and rejected on the merits, in a legal malpractice action litigated by the parties in Supreme Court, Westchester County. Plaintiff is thus collaterally estopped from relitigating her essential breach of duty claims (see Ryan v New York Tel., 62 NY2d 494, 500 [1984]). Moreover, inasmuch as this action and the prior action are premised on the identical underlying transactions, the unappealed dismissal on the merits of the prior action is entitled to res judicata effect with respect to the instant action (see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]; Barrett v Kasco Constr. Co., Inc., 84 AD2d 555 [1981], affd 56 NY2d 830 [1982]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lefkowitz v. Etra & Etra, 13 A.D.3d 132, 787 N.Y.S.2d 5, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 132 (Lefkowitz v. Etra & Etra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SC Prop. Dev., LLC v. MW Capital LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 02741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Siegel v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Irvington
73 A.D.3d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Lefkowitz v. Bank of New York
676 F. Supp. 2d 229 (S.D. New York, 2009)