Lefkovitz v. United Employment Agencies, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lefkovitz v. United Employment Agencies, Inc.

152 Misc. 272, 273 N.Y.S. 352, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1493

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 152 Misc. 272 (Lefkovitz v. United Employment Agencies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lefkovitz v. United Employment Agencies, Inc., 152 Misc. 272, 273 N.Y.S. 352, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant corporation failed to furnish plaintiff with the verified statement required by section 77 of the Stock Corporation Law for a period of sixteen days. Plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to recovery of the penalty of fifty dollars for the first day’s failure to comply with the statute, and ten dollars for each succeeding fifteen days.

Judgment modified by striking out so much thereof as awards recovery in favor of defendant United Employment Agencies, Inc., against the plaintiff, and by directing judgment in favor of plaintiff against said defendant in the sum of $200, with costs, and as modified affirmed.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant corporation failed to furnish plaintiff with the verified statement required by section 77 of the Stock Corporation Law for a period of sixteen days. Plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to recovery of the penalty of fifty dollars for the first day’s failure to comply with the statute, and ten dollars for each succeeding fifteen days.

Judgment modified by striking out so much thereof as awards recovery in favor of defendant United Employment Agencies, Inc., against the plaintiff, and by directing judgment in favor of plaintiff against said defendant in the sum of $200, with costs, and as modified affirmed.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 Misc. 272, 273 N.Y.S. 352, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefkovitz-v-united-employment-agencies-inc-nyappterm-1934.