Lefils v. Ocwen Federal Bank

766 So. 2d 337, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2000 WL 702402
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 2000
DocketNo. 1D00-0056
StatusPublished

This text of 766 So. 2d 337 (Lefils v. Ocwen Federal Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lefils v. Ocwen Federal Bank, 766 So. 2d 337, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2000 WL 702402 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellants’ .response to the order issued February 8, 2000, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Perimeter Investments, Inc. v. Amerifirst Development Co. of Central Florida, Inc., 423 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (dismissing appeals from orders denying motions for leave to file counterclaim as non-final, non-appealable.) Appellees’ Motion for Expansion of Time in Which to [338]*338File a Response Brief is hereby denied as moot.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perimeter Inv., Inc. v. Amerifirst Dev. Co., Etc.
423 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
766 So. 2d 337, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2000 WL 702402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefils-v-ocwen-federal-bank-fladistctapp-2000.