Lefils v. Ocwen Federal Bank
766 So. 2d 337, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2000 WL 702402
Opinion
Having considered appellants’ .response to the order issued February 8, 2000, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Perimeter Investments, Inc. v. Amerifirst Development Co. of Central Florida, Inc., 423 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (dismissing appeals from orders denying motions for leave to file counterclaim as non-final, non-appealable.) Appellees’ Motion for Expansion of Time in Which to [338] File a Response Brief is hereby denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lefils v. Ocwen Federal Bank, 766 So. 2d 337, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2000 WL 702402 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
766 So. 2d 337 (Lefils v. Ocwen Federal Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perimeter Inv., Inc. v. Amerifirst Dev. Co., Etc.
423 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)