Leffler v. Brotherton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Leffler v. Brotherton

425 S.W.3d 141, 2014 WL 114148, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 18

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 2014·No. No. WD 76378·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Larry and Ida Brotherton appeal from the trial court’s November 7, 2012 order re-affirming the parties’ stipulated order and March 28, 2013 summary judgment in favor of Charles Leffler on their counterclaim for equitable mortgage. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The order and judgment are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

[142] The order and judgment are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Larry and Ida Brotherton appeal from the trial court’s November 7, 2012 order re-affirming the parties’ stipulated order and March 28, 2013 summary judgment in favor of Charles Leffler on their counterclaim for equitable mortgage. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The order and judgment are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

[142] The order and judgment are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Leffler v. Brotherton, 425 S.W.3d 141, 2014 WL 114148, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 18 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

425 S.W.3d 141 (Leffler v. Brotherton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.