Leffingwell v. Griffing
This text of 29 Cal. 192 (Leffingwell v. Griffing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from an order overruling plaintiff’s objections to defendant’s motion for settlement of a statement on motion for new trial, and ordering said statement to be settled.
The order is not appealable. It was made in the course of proceedings taken with a view to a new trial, and is no more the subject of appeal than the order made in the course of the same proceedings fixing the 13th of February, 1865, as the day for settling the statement.
Further, there is no specification of grounds in the statement accompanying the appeal. The appeal is not based alone upon the affidavit contained in the record, but upon the affidavit aided, by a statement of facts aliunde, and is within the principle of Haggin v. Clark, 28 Cal. 162.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Cal. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leffingwell-v-griffing-cal-1865.