Leffingwell v. Elliott

27 Mass. 204
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court

held, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover in full the sums reported by the auditor in the first and second classes of the claims, except the sums paid to counsel; and that in the third class the counsel fees must be disallowed, and the other charges be placed upon the same ground in this as in other actions, trespass for example ;1 and that the fees of the auditor were to be allowed in the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leffingwell v. Elliott, 27 Mass. 204 (Mass. 1830).

27 Mass. 204 (Leffingwell v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hiss v. Friedberg
112 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1960)