Leffingwell v. Elliott
27 Mass. 204
Opinion
held, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover in full the sums reported by the auditor in the first and second classes of the claims, except the sums paid to counsel; and that in the third class the counsel fees must be disallowed, and the other charges be placed upon the same ground in this as in other actions, trespass for example ;1 and that the fees of the auditor were to be allowed in the costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leffingwell v. Elliott, 27 Mass. 204 (Mass. 1830).
27 Mass. 204 (Leffingwell v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hiss v. Friedberg
112 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1960)