Leffert v. Marcus
This text of 7 A.D.2d 989 (Leffert v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and defendant-respondent’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency denied, with $10 costs. In this stockholder’s derivative action the motion to dismiss was addressed to the entire complaint, but some of the allegations at least, such as the granting of stock options to respondent as a result of his misrepresentations, sufficiently set forth acts of misconduct for which the corporation can recover. Concur — Botein, P. J., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.2d 989, 183 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leffert-v-marcus-nyappdiv-1959.