Leffert v. Marcus

7 A.D.2d 989, 183 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9365
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A.D.2d 989 (Leffert v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leffert v. Marcus, 7 A.D.2d 989, 183 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and defendant-respondent’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency denied, with $10 costs. In this stockholder’s derivative action the motion to dismiss was addressed to the entire complaint, but some of the allegations at least, such as the granting of stock options to respondent as a result of his misrepresentations, sufficiently set forth acts of misconduct for which the corporation can recover. Concur — Botein, P. J., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton Partners, L.P. v. Englard
11 A.3d 1180 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 A.D.2d 989, 183 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leffert-v-marcus-nyappdiv-1959.