Leff v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leff v. Goldstein

8 A.D.2d 845, 190 N.Y.S.2d 629, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 845 (Leff v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leff v. Goldstein, 8 A.D.2d 845, 190 N.Y.S.2d 629, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff against defendants, and the court granted the motion of defendant Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Company, Inc., to set aside the verdict and to dismiss the complaint as to it. The appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of the judgment entered thereon as granted the motion. Judgment insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to modify the judgment by striking from the second decretal paragraph thereof everything following the words “set aside and that ” and by substituting therefor the words “ a new trial be had between the plaintiff and said defendant.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff against defendants, and the court granted the motion of defendant Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Company, Inc., to set aside the verdict and to dismiss the complaint as to it. The appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of the judgment entered thereon as granted the motion. Judgment insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to modify the judgment by striking from the second decretal paragraph thereof everything following the words “set aside and that ” and by substituting therefor the words “ a new trial be had between the plaintiff and said defendant.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 845, 190 N.Y.S.2d 629, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leff-v-goldstein-nyappdiv-1959.