Leff v. Board of Elections
This text of 442 N.E.2d 447 (Leff v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Gammerman v Board of Elections of City of N. Y., 57 NY2d 888, decided herewith).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The drastic result in this case is the consequence of the harsh rule this court enunciated in such cases as Matter of Rutter v Coveney (38 NY2d 993) and Matter of Higby v Mahoney (48 NY2d 15). Reiterating the views I expressed in those cases, I would find an exception for the extraordinary circumstances which confront us now and reverse.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 N.E.2d 447, 57 N.Y.2d 890, 456 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leff-v-board-of-elections-ny-1982.