Lefever v. United States
This text of 631 F. App'x 134 (Lefever v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Christopher Ross LeFever, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Le-Fever v. United States, No. 7:14-cv00600-MFU-RSB (WD.Va. June 19, 2015). We deny LeFever’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[135]*135tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
631 F. App'x 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefever-v-united-states-ca4-2016.