Lefever v. United States

631 F. App'x 134
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7285
StatusPublished

This text of 631 F. App'x 134 (Lefever v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lefever v. United States, 631 F. App'x 134 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Ross LeFever, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Le-Fever v. United States, No. 7:14-cv00600-MFU-RSB (WD.Va. June 19, 2015). We deny LeFever’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[135]*135tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
631 F. App'x 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefever-v-united-states-ca4-2016.