Lefever v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Lefever v. State

195 S.W.3d 928, 359 Ark. 251

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 21, 2004·No. CR 04-1028·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Robert Lefever, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Cindy M. Baker, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Robert Lefever, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Cindy M. Baker, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Lefever v. State, 195 S.W.3d 928, 359 Ark. 251 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

195 S.W.3d 928 (Lefever v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.