Leete v. Sutherland

15 P. 472, 20 Nev. 71
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 5, 1887
DocketNo. 1268.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 P. 472 (Leete v. Sutherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leete v. Sutherland, 15 P. 472, 20 Nev. 71 (Neb. 1887).

Opinion

By the Court,

Belknap, J.:

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. Application for the order was made to the district court upon the ground of irregularity upon the part of the adverse party, and in the proceedings of the court, and surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against.

Motions for new trials for these causes must be supported by affidavits. The record does not contain the affidavits used in *73 support of the motion. We are, therefore, unable to review the ruling of the district court. In the absence of an affirmative showing to the contrary, the presumption is, that affidavits were used in support of the motion, and that the ruling was correct.

The order of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gamble v. Hanchett
35 Nev. 319 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1912)
Schwartz v. Stock
65 P. 351 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 P. 472, 20 Nev. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leete-v-sutherland-nev-1887.