Leet v. Grants

36 Cal. 288
California Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Sprague, J. :

In granting the order setting aside the judgment entered by default, upon the facts presented as the basis of the motion, the Court below seems to have very properly exercised its discretionary powers; but such order should have contained the statutory prerequisite to its taking effect, that applicant pay all costs accruing to the plaintiff in the cause up to the date of the filing and service of the motion. (Sec. 68 Practice Act; Howe v. Independence Company, 29 Cal. 74.)

With such modification the order should be permitted to stand, respondent paying the costs of this appeal.

So ordered, and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leet v. Grants, 36 Cal. 288 (Cal. 1868).

36 Cal. 288 (Leet v. Grants) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lavoie v. Bourque
172 A.2d 565 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1961)
Erpenbach v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
67 N.W. 606 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1896)