Lees v. Dobson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lees v. Dobson

49 N.Y.S. 902

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1898·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the plaintiff is receiver of the firm of Rothschild & Schwab, and as such he represented, not only the members of that firm, but also all the creditors. The case is therefore precisely within the principle established in the case of Bank [903]*903v. Goddard, 131 N. Y. 494, 30 N. E. 566, and must be controlled by the rules laid down in that case.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case the plaintiff is receiver of the firm of Rothschild & Schwab, and as such he represented, not only the members of that firm, but also all the creditors. The case is therefore precisely within the principle established in the case of Bank [903]*903v. Goddard, 131 N. Y. 494, 30 N. E. 566, and must be controlled by the rules laid down in that case.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Lees v. Dobson, 49 N.Y.S. 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

49 N.Y.S. 902 (Lees v. Dobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related