Lees v. Dobson

49 N.Y.S. 902

This text of 49 N.Y.S. 902 (Lees v. Dobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lees v. Dobson, 49 N.Y.S. 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the plaintiff is receiver of the firm of Rothschild & Schwab, and as such he represented, not only the members of that firm, but also all the creditors. The case is therefore precisely within the principle established in the case of Bank [903]*903v. Goddard, 131 N. Y. 494, 30 N. E. 566, and must be controlled by the rules laid down in that case.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Park Bank v. Goddard
30 N.E. 566 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 N.Y.S. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lees-v-dobson-nyappdiv-1898.