Lees v. Brownings
This text of 15 Ala. 495 (Lees v. Brownings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The statute, in express language, requires the next of kin to be informed of an application to probate the [497]*497will of a deceased relative, and only allows the application to be heard, and determined without notice, when the next of kin do not reside in the State. Clay’s Dig. 303. The record shows, that the minor heirs of Mary Lee, were of the next of kin to the testator, and interested with the other next of kin, in his estate. Yet the will was probated without notice to them, or to their guardian. This is clearly an error, for which the probate of the will must be reversed. 4 Ala. Rep. 242.
The plaintiffs in error, claiming an interest in the estate of tke deceased, and a right to examine into the decree probating his will, filed their petition, setting forth their interest; and notice of their petition being given to the executors, and other next of kin, they were admitted as parties to the record. This is the correct practice, and entitles them to sue out a writ of error. Watson and wife v. May, 9 Ala. Rep. 177.
The final decree probating the will, must be reversed, and the cause remanded, for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ala. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lees-v-brownings-ala-1849.