Lee's Estate

56 A. 425, 207 Pa. 218, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 476
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 9, 1903·No. Appeal, No. 12·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The will of testator placed the bequest to his daughter in trust- for her, the trust to end in the event of the husband’s death before hers ; that event did not occur, but the marriage relation was dissolved by a decree in divorce. Evidently, the sole purpose of the trust was to protect her estate from the husband Jacob E. Blackmore; the law has severed the matrimonial bond as effectually as death could have done; therefore, the sole purpose of the trust being atan end, the daughter is entitled to the estate. So the court below on the authority of Koenig’s Appeal, 57 Pa. 352, rightly decided.

The decree is affirmed on its opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee's Estate, 56 A. 425, 207 Pa. 218, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 476 (Pa. 1903).

56 A. 425 (Lee's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Adoption of a Minor
214 F.2d 844 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)
Moore's Estate
35 Pa. D. & C. 694 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1939)
Simon's Estate
34 Pa. D. & C. 475 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1939)
Greenleaf v. Plainfield Trust Co.
195 A. 303 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Frey's Estate
24 Pa. D. & C. 114 (York County Orphans' Court, 1935)
Henry's Estate
114 A. 777 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Mosle v. Goodrich
109 A. 166 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1920)
Jacobs v. Cornils
167 Iowa 196 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1914)
Packer's Estate
92 A. 65 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)