Lee's Adm'r v. Harper

6 Ky. Op. 416, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 189
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Ky. Op. 416 (Lee's Adm'r v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee's Adm'r v. Harper, 6 Ky. Op. 416, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 189 (Ky. Ct. App. 1873).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

Conceding that the agreement by which the appellees obtained possession to run the mill race through the appellant’s land was executed on the Sabbath, if after its execution it was ratified and confirmed by the appellees, it then Recomes valid and obligatory upon them. Whether or not there was such a confirmation of the agreement after its date by the appellees is'a question for the jury to determine. The instructions to find for the defendants in the event the writing was executed on the Sabbath was erroneous, without at the same time so qualifying that instructions as to enable the jury to determine from' the evidence, whether or not it had afterwards been ratified. Ray v. Callett, 12 B. Mon. 532.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and cause remanded [417]*417with directions to award the appellant a new trial and for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Bullock, for appellants.-

-, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hofgesang v. Silver
23 S.W.2d 945 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ky. Op. 416, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lees-admr-v-harper-kyctapp-1873.