Lee's Administrator v. Carter

3 Va. 121
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedJanuary 25, 1812
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 121 (Lee's Administrator v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee's Administrator v. Carter, 3 Va. 121 (Va. 1812).

Opinion

To this judgment a writ of supersedeas was awarded ; and, on Saturday the 25th of January, 1812. the following opinion of this Court was pronounced by

Judge Roane.

“ The judgment of the District Court is defective in this, that when the plea was withdrawn by the appearance bail, who was the defendant in the issue formed by that plea, the Court ought to have entered judgment, as well against John T. Carter, against whom an office judgment had theretofore been confined, as against the said appearance bail. The judgment is therefore reversed with costs and this C'-urt, proceeding, &c. Is is considered that the appellant recover against William Forbes, the appearance bail, as to whom this suit remains undefended, - and against John T. Carter, (against whom the re was an office judgment con firmed at August rules, 1803.) the sum of five hundred dollars, the debt in the declaration mentioned, and his costs ; but this judgment is to be discharged,” &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Va. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lees-administrator-v-carter-va-1812.