Leeper, R. v. Tinkey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 16, 2017·No. 194 WAL 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

RANDY LEEPER AND CONNIE LEEPER, : No. 194 WAL 2017 :

Petitioners :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

JAMES TINKEY, DEAN TINKEY, RALPH : TINKEY, AND HAROLD TINKEY, : INDIVIDUALLY AND /OR T/D/B/A TINKEY : BROTHERS LUMBER COMPANY, : AND/OR TINKEY BROS.: J. R. ENOS, : INDIVIDUALLY AND OR T/D/B/A PAUL : BUNYAN TREE SERVICE; PAUL : BUNYAN TREE SERVICE; PATRICK : MONROE; JOSEPH C. MONROE; : ROSALLE COTTON, EXECUTRIX OF : THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH A. MONROE, : DECEASED; LILLIAN FAY MONROE; : EOG RESOURCES, INC., CROWN : COMMUNICATIONS; CROWN CASTLE : USA, T/D/B/A CROWN : COMMUNICATIONS; AND CROWN : CASTLE INTERNATIONAL, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leeper, R. v. Tinkey, (Pa. 2017).

Leeper, R. v. Tinkey (Leeper, R. v. Tinkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.