Leeper, R. v. Tinkey
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
RANDY LEEPER AND CONNIE LEEPER, : No. 194 WAL 2017 :
Petitioners :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
JAMES TINKEY, DEAN TINKEY, RALPH : TINKEY, AND HAROLD TINKEY, : INDIVIDUALLY AND /OR T/D/B/A TINKEY : BROTHERS LUMBER COMPANY, : AND/OR TINKEY BROS.: J. R. ENOS, : INDIVIDUALLY AND OR T/D/B/A PAUL : BUNYAN TREE SERVICE; PAUL : BUNYAN TREE SERVICE; PATRICK : MONROE; JOSEPH C. MONROE; : ROSALLE COTTON, EXECUTRIX OF : THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH A. MONROE, : DECEASED; LILLIAN FAY MONROE; : EOG RESOURCES, INC., CROWN : COMMUNICATIONS; CROWN CASTLE : USA, T/D/B/A CROWN : COMMUNICATIONS; AND CROWN : CASTLE INTERNATIONAL, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leeper, R. v. Tinkey (Leeper, R. v. Tinkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.